home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ORDER LIST
-
-
- TUESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1994
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- D-1356 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BERNARD M. SEEMAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Bernard
-
- M. Seeman, of Lake Success, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of February 22, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Bernard M. Seeman from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Bernard M. Seeman be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1371 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN MARTIN McGRATH
-
- It having been reported to the Court that John
-
- Martin McGrath, of Merrillville, Indiana, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Indiana and this Court by order of March 7, 1994,
-
- having suspended the said John Martin McGrath from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said John Martin McGrath be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1383 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RONALD HARVEY BUDMAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Ronald
-
- Harvey Budman, of San Antonio, Texas, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas
-
- and this Court by order of April 18, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Ronald Harvey Budman from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Ronald Harvey Budman be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1384 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM EUGENE WELLS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that William
-
- Eugene Wells, of Houston, Texas, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas and
-
- this Court by order of April 18, 1994, having suspended
-
- the said William Eugene Wells from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring
-
- him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said William Eugene Wells be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1388 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LEE J. KLEIN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Lee J.
-
- Klein, of Lansing, Michigan, has been suspended from the
-
- practice of law by the Supreme Court of Michigan and
-
- this Court by order of April 25, 1994, having suspended
-
- the said Lee J. Klein from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Lee J. Klein be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1390 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALAN E. DUBOW
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Alan E.
-
- Dubow, of New York, New York, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida and
-
- this Court by order of May 2, 1994, having suspended the
-
- said Alan E. Dubow from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Alan E. Dubow be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1393 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ERIO M. COMICI
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Erio M.
-
- Comici, of Chesterfield, Missouri, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
-
- Missouri and this Court by order of May 23, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Erio M. Comici from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Erio M. Comici be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1394 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NORMAN C. FARHAT
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Norman C.
-
- Farhat, of Farmington Hills, Michigan, has been
-
- suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Michigan and this Court by order of May 23, 1994,
-
- having suspended the said Norman C. Farhat from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Norman C. Farhat be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1395 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LAWRENCE D. MORINGIELLO
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Lawrence
-
- D. Moringiello, of Brooklyn, New York, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of May 23, 1994, having suspended
-
- the said Lawrence D. Moringiello from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Lawrence D. Moringiello
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1397 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD H. CLOUTIER
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Edward H.
-
- Cloutier, of Livermore Falls, Maine, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Judicial Court
-
- of Maine and this Court by order of May 31, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Edward H. Cloutier from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Edward H. Cloutier be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1398 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LELAND TRICKETT SLOAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Leland
-
- Trickett Sloan, of St. Albans, West Virginia, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Appeals of West Virginia and this Court by order of
-
- June 6, 1994, having suspended the said Leland Trickett
-
- Sloan from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Leland Trickett Sloan
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1402 IN THE MATTER OF JAMES H. GRIFFIN
-
- James H. Griffin, of Los Angeles, California,
-
- having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of
-
- this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from
-
- the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the
-
- Bar of this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore
-
- issued on June 6, 1994, is hereby discharged.
-
- D-1417 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SAMUEL ASBELL
-
- It is ordered that Samuel Asbell, of Camden, New
-
- Jersey, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1418 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN B. GRIFFITH
-
- It is ordered that John B. Griffith, of Silver
-
- Spring, Maryland, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1419 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DOUGLAS L. LASHLEY
-
- It is ordered that Douglas L. Lashley, of Olney,
-
- Maryland, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1420 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARRY J. BERNSTEIN
-
- It is ordered that Harry J. Bernstein, of Belmore,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
- D-1421 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALLAN G. SLAN
-
- It is ordered that Allan G. Slan, of Rockville,
-
- Maryland, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1422 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRED M. MOSELY
-
- It is ordered that Fred M. Mosely, of East
-
- Cleveland, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1423 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NWABUEZE VINCENT OKOCHA
-
- It is ordered that Nwabueze Vincent Okocha, of
-
- Cleveland, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1424 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES CHARLES HOLZMANN
-
- It is ordered that James Charles Holzmann, of San
-
- Diego, California, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1425 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HAROLD B. ABRAMS
-
- It is ordered that Harold B. Abrams, of Los
-
- Angeles, California, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1426 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PATRICK JAMES NOLAN
-
- It is ordered that Patrick James Nolan, of
-
- Sacramento, California, be suspended from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1427 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LAWRENCE SCHECHTERMAN
-
- It is ordered that Lawrence Schechterman, of Boca
-
- Raton, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1428 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LES PAUL STERNBERG
-
- It is ordered that Les Paul Sternberg, of Sunrise,
-
- Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1429 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DONALD RAY BERNARD
-
- It is ordered that Donald Ray Bernard, of Seabrook,
-
- Texas, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1430 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CARL M. FIELD
-
- It is ordered that Carl M. Field, of Cedarhurst,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1431 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT W. SCHMIEDER
-
- It is ordered that Robert W. Schmieder, of
-
- Belleville, Illinois, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1432 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRUCE A. THOMPSON
-
- It is ordered that Bruce A. Thompson, of Fair
-
- Haven, New Jersey, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1433 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES B. CORCES
-
- It is ordered that Charles B. Corces, of Tampa,
-
- Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 92-2038 ASGROW SEED COMPANY V. DENNY WINTERBOER, ET AL.
-
- 93-1543 McKENNON, CHRISTINE V. NASHVILLE BANNER PUBLISHING
-
- The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to
-
- participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for
-
- divided argument are granted.
-
- 93-1340 UNITED STATES V. MEZZANATTO, GARY
-
- The motion of National Association of Criminal
-
- Defense Lawyers, et al. for leave to file a brief as
-
- amici curiae is granted.
-
- 93-1631 BENTSEN, SEC. OF TREASURY V. ADOLPH COORS COMPANY
-
- The motion of respondent to substitute Coors
-
- Brewing Company in place of Adolph Coors Company is
-
- granted.
-
- 93-1636 SWINT, TOM, ET AL. V. CHAMBERS CTY. COMMN., ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioners to dispense with printing
-
- the joint appendix is granted.
-
- 93-7901 SCHLUP, LLOYD V. DELO, SUPT., POTOSI
-
- The motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- 92-7264 WALKER, WILSON V. SCOTT, DIR. TX DCJ
-
- 93-1329 DiPINTO, DENNIS, ET AL. V. SPERLING, JOHN, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 93-1377 WARDLAW, WILLIAM V. PICKETT, WILLIAM, ET AL.
-
- 93-1469 FOXWOOD MGMT. CO., ET AL. V. FDIC, ET AL.
-
- 93-1620 RUBENS, RICHARD, ET UX. V. SHINE, JULIANELLE, KARP, ETC.
-
- 93-1652 CALDERON, WARDEN, ET AL. V. HAMILTON, BERNARD LEE
-
- 93-1654 CRUTCHFIELD, MICHAEL V. McGREGOR, CAROL
-
- 93-1730 MICCIO, ARTHUR V. NJ DEPT. OF COM. AFFAIRS
-
- 93-1815 BURNS-TOOLE, PEGGY V. BYRNE, ROGER, ET AL.
-
- 93-1868 ORTMAN, WILLIAM V. OAKLAND COUNTY, MI, ET AL.
-
- 93-7394 McCLENDON, RAYMOND L. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 93-7936 SMITH, ERSKINE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8044 TOEGEMANN, ARTHUR V. RICH, GREGORY, ET AL.
-
- 93-8272 GAYDOS, MARIA L. C. V. CHERTOFF, U.S. ATTY., ET AL.
-
- 93-8315 RUCHTI, ROBERT R. V. HEDLEY, MARY L., ET AL.
-
- 93-8368 ASRAR, RAFAT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8436 REID, KEVIN J. V. FLINT, ET AL.
-
- 93-8439 CLINTON, WALI S. V. SMITH, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 93-8494 HAWKINS, FREDERICK L. V. GREEN, JAMES, ET AL.
-
- 93-8510 MARK, GLEN V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 93-8530 PAYNE, RICHARD V. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF
-
- 93-8595 KLEINSCHMIDT, MARIE, ET AL. V. LIBERTY MUTUAL INS., ET AL.
-
- 93-8619 LANGE, MICHAEL A. V. HEITKAMP, M. K., ET AL.
-
- 93-8628 TAVERAS, SIGFREDO V. NY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
-
- 93-8639 JEFFRESS, JESSE W. V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA
-
- 93-8664 BURNETT, TERRY V. FAIRLEY, LINDSEY, ET AL.
-
- 93-8695 CARPENTER, FRANKLIN, ET UX. V. BLANKENSHIP, JACQUELINE L.
-
- 93-8718 FROMAL, PATRICIA W. V. ROBINS, JOHN E., ET AL.
-
- 93-8727 POOLE, ROBERT L. V. HOLLAND, WARDEN
-
- 93-8771 EDWARDS, JERRY M. V. HARGETT, WARDEN
-
- 93-8807 SULE, USMAN SHEHU V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8831 BARNES, THEODORE NATHAN V. GARETNER, TIMOTHY, ET AL.
-
- 93-8861 COOLEY, WILBERT, ET UX. V. KNAPP, KENNETH L., ET AL.
-
- 93-8911 OKOR, CHRISTIAN E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-9057 NEWKIRK, JAMES H. V. SMITH, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 93-9320 IN RE JOHN R. FRANZ
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 93-10 CULLEN, MARK T. V. TRAINOR, ROBERTSON, SMITS & WADE, ET AL.
-
- The motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing
-
- is denied.
-
- 93-1443 MAKIN, THOMAS V. EVANS, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed
-
- further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The
-
- petition for rehearing is denied.
-
-
-
- ORDER
-
-
- It is ordered by this Court that Dale E. Bosley be,
-
- and he is hereby, appointed Marshal of this Court, effective
-
- August 1, 1994.
-
-